Comments on: Development.TV http://www.microguy.net/2009/09/05/development-tv/ Roaming the Internet Since 1996 Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:24:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: mike http://www.microguy.net/2009/09/05/development-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-760 mike Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:18:46 +0000 http://www.microguy.net/?p=1650#comment-760 good post microguy good post microguy

]]> By: MicroGuy http://www.microguy.net/2009/09/05/development-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-736 MicroGuy Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:41:36 +0000 http://www.microguy.net/?p=1650#comment-736 Thanks for your comments. But I never said there was anything wrong with their policy of only allowing input from members of the maniacal and delusional Dot TV PumpSquad™. It was an observation not a judgment. Thanks for your comments. But I never said there was anything wrong with their policy of only allowing input from members of the maniacal and delusional Dot TV PumpSquad™. It was an observation not a judgment.

]]> By: esatyrical http://www.microguy.net/2009/09/05/development-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-734 esatyrical Sat, 05 Sep 2009 07:28:15 +0000 http://www.microguy.net/?p=1650#comment-734 <cite>The .TV forum infamous for excluding any voice with an objective opinion...</cite> What's your evidence? Wholly untrue in my experience. I posted there c.25 times and I hold an agnostic view on .TV now and for its future, and I pointed out some of the disadvantages in several posts. Others of a similar disposition - localexperts, for example - were invariably objective on the merits or otherwise of using the extension. Development.tv's target audience were primarily those interested or active in building out sites on the extension. If the owner was deleting posts that didn't fit the site's aims, why not? The .TV forum infamous for excluding any voice with an objective opinion…

What’s your evidence?

Wholly untrue in my experience. I posted there c.25 times and I hold an agnostic view on .TV now and for its future, and I pointed out some of the disadvantages in several posts. Others of a similar disposition – localexperts, for example – were invariably objective on the merits or otherwise of using the extension.

Development.tv’s target audience were primarily those interested or active in building out sites on the extension. If the owner was deleting posts that didn’t fit the site’s aims, why not?

]]>